KTMSprocket wrote:definately noticed the Sherco had fast and reactive stereing. The Scorpa had slower steering and more compliant suspension.
Do any of you guys know if this is due to substantially different rake and trail angles?
You got it....but just add frame geometry, swing-arm, wheelbase, centre of gravity and the riders geometry!!..... to that list too
KTMSprocket wrote:I swapped to a Scorpa...
Well here’s a turn out for the books….I thought you'd given up Trials???
KTMSprocket wrote:(I swapped to a Scorpa...and now ride better....sorry, but true.....

I can believe that you believe this. And it could even be very true.
The older frame 290 are not the best first bike. The powerful engine makes them a bit unforgiving. And a small mistakes ends up hurting big time.
But the reality is that the Scorpa 2T and the 04 Sherco are simular generation bikes. So the pros and cons tend to even out.
But I’ve learnt that it’s really the rider’s adaptation to the bike that provides the control.
I spent many hours trying to tame my 290. But now I love the “high power on demand” of my 250. Which is actually more than my old 290 used to offer.
And I agree the suspension and geometry of the Scorpa felt great when I rode it. But there were a number of things that made the 2T “not for me”. And I’m still very happy with that choice, I made, just for me.
In reality I find trials a “mental sport” (Crazy too

). If you believe you can successfully ride a section or obstacle, you normally can….Trouble is, most of us need to successfully ride that section, before we believe it.
So enjoy your Scorpa……because the more you ride the more you'll appreciate "there's more to this than meets anyones eye".
Best of balance.
Neo