Page 3 of 4

Re: Trials for back pain

Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 8:56 pm
by David Lahey
Kombivan wrote:who was it? yamaico

yes and here is yamaico's creation

Re: Trials for back pain

Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 9:54 pm
by paul b
This thread is getting way off track.
I have back pain issues.
The best way to manage it is to do stretching exercises every day. It takes about 12 minutes every morning.
A chiropractor of physiotherapist should be able to recommend a series of exercises.
You can probably download a suitable list.
Taking vitamin supplements like Fish Oil and Glucosamine may help also.
Works for me!

Re: Trials for back pain

Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 7:34 pm
by Kombivan
At the top of this rock face is a cliff on the other side So don't make the same mistake I almost did.

Image

Going up was easy Going Down was the catch. What you can't see in these photo's is the cave at the bottom that we had to ride over on the way down I actually had to wheel stand just above the top of the cave so I could land in the sand on both wheels.

Image

IF you look at the kid standing near the top of the rock you will see how steep this wall is as he is standing vertical.

Image

These were the good ole days that rock wall has not been ridden again except for me as you can't get to it now days as the sand has been washed out and you can't get a good go at it at least that was the way it was last time I was down there.

Re: Trials for back pain

Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 8:31 pm
by Kombivan
Back Pain Chiropractor, Cod liver oil, magnesium, calcium and potassium all help, forget the pain killers let your body tell you what you are able to do dancing and trials riding for some reason help me get by. Restoring bikes also helps pass the time even though it cost a fortune I just hope I don't have to sell these two later on. I still can't believe what was done to that yamaha.

Re: Trials for back pain

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 12:06 am
by Kombivan
Image

349 Montesa Purchased 2004/5 with no compression not yet ridden 2014 March

Image

Frame ready for powder coater & old rusted forks I learnt today the 349 frame is shorter than the 247 from top of shocks to the post at the front tried a 71 cota tank on it.

Image

Tub of new Goodies I have been collecting since before I purchased the bike I purchased the new barrel Piston and rings std size before I purchased a 349. I wanted one.

Re: Trials for back pain

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 1:17 am
by Kombivan
I still love that cty175 neat. the original front wheel with the 3.25 tyre works great in sand. I am the only person to ride up the sand hill at north one mile Forster and I did it on a CT1 175cc yamaha in 1972. The places we used to be able to ride was so cool red tape is the worst thing to happen to this country.

Re: Trials for back pain

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 4:55 pm
by JC1
If you want to identify what model the black Sherpa is, compare the pics below.
Kombivan wrote:
Image


Here is a factory brochure of the '74 Sherpa. (Altho this is the 325 the 250 was visually the same apart from barrell & head.)
SherpaT '74.jpg
SherpaT '74.jpg (104.9 KiB) Viewed 23100 times


You can see both the central vertical down-tube still there & the Y-section tubes as well.

Here's the 250 version, tho with the diff tank for the UK market:
bultaco sherpa t 250  m124.jpg
bultaco sherpa t 250 m124.jpg (162 KiB) Viewed 23100 times


Here is the first of the models with the new generation frame - the '75 brochure (The production version was 1st available in late '75 after being shown at the Barcelona Motor-show):
Sherpa T-75 brochure.jpg
Sherpa T-75 brochure.jpg (70.13 KiB) Viewed 23100 times

If you look carefully you can see that this model has a very diff frame to the black bike, even if at 1st glance it looks somewhat alike.

Re: Trials for back pain

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 5:44 pm
by brownie
I think JC1 is right in the black bike being a m91
Things unique to the later 91/2 framed bike to the 124/5 and 150/1 are
Frame mounted side stand instead of swingarm mounted, not tapered steering head between bearings, mud catcher rear rim and earlier brake hub, still have the the tapered fork tubes at the top clamp, chain tensioner arm mounted on the outside of the chain instead of the inside like the photo of the blue UK bike the brochure photo may have been pre production.
When the frame changed on the later 91/2 I thought was for lightness not strength wasn't it supposed to be the first chro-mo frame?

Re: Trials for back pain

Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2014 1:04 am
by Kombivan
just had a look at the original photo and it does show the post clearer so its a m91. thank you for that. So I guess thats a 73/74 model then

Re: Trials for back pain

Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2014 12:15 pm
by sherpa
holesgf.jpg
holesgf.jpg (130.7 KiB) Viewed 23084 times
Yes it is a 250 M91, with the second series frame. Made from 5/1972 to 9/1973
The photo is of a prototype factory 325 incorporating both frame designs.
Cheers Greg