I think this will be my last post on engine development.
I have absolutely nailed it. Instant response, pickes up the front wheel in the lower gears with just a wrap of the throttle from anywhere from not much off idle, revs out then just solely fades, idles nicely at really low revs. It's a different motor to what it used to be. Once again it's the tedious combination of a lot of seemingly unimportant changes that work together

I did it!
I have documented the process except for the porting so that others could reproduce it. Unfortunately I don't know what some of the parts I used are off but you can get around that as I will explain.
1976 24mm DT 175 carb:
The DT175 needle dose not work till the upper rev range and is boggy down low (to lean)
The TY needle is better because of its finer profile but still a bit off
? Needle (No ideas what it's off or where I picked it up and has no markings?) is perfect the profile is similar to the ty but is comes to the narrowest size about a cm from the end and maintains that shape, where the ty tapers all the way in.
*This means the motor is thirsty really early and is governed by the main jet much earlier than most motors. The main jet now becomes mor critical earlier than normal.
I used a emulsion tube I found at wreckers at the bottom of a really big box of carby parts? It has the same emulsion tube holes as the DT, TY175JC and most modem bikes. Finer atismisation than the to hole at the top TY type. This emulsion tube fits the TY float bowl so I can have the quick change main jet type which is unique to the TY.
The needle clip is second from the bottom which is a richer setting. Middle is ok and bottom is to fat and a touch lethargic. Second from the bottom is perfect
I used a 1.5 cutaway on the slide. This just taylers the mixture to be a bit richer at low throttle openings. At tha 1/4 throttle range the lower cutaway will draw the fuel out more and richen the mix. It alowes you to fine tune for that snap. The DT is 2.5 and 22mm TY is a 3 which makes seance as the 22mm is much smaller and will be drawing harder at around 1/4 a 1/3 throttle.
*I used a 210 main jet
The 240 is to big and feels rich like a normal TY with out that fat rich snap. the 180 is to boggy (lean) don't forget for a TY using the multiple hole emulsion tube 140 is standard.
Interesting thing is the standard DT used a 160 main with the good emulsion tube. The JC use a 140 with the good emulsion tube. The DT has a really soft taper needle where a TY comes to a sharper point for richer up top.
Conclusion:
My motor is really thirsty. I'm using a bigger main jet than a DT and far richer profile needle plus a richer slide. Way way richer than a JC.
The motor needs fuel down low like a TY but much more up top than a DT. TY don't have a expansion chamber so at higher revs the charge is not pushed back in as you get with a expansion chamber tuned to a rev range. This means the motor will lean out above a certain rev range. Normally the charge comes out the transfer ports goes up the back acros the plug and out the exhaust. The expansion chambers job is to be tuned to a rev range where it has a back pulse that pushes the escaping charge back in just before the piston comes up and cuts it off.
The TY muffler can never do that so from a certain rev range it just goes out and is lost. Now I have a better flow and much more charge than any normal TY which gives the motor the ability to rev out more.
The need for a richer mix and profile is the result of flowing more air. More air needs more fuel to keep it at the right ratios for a bigger bang.
When you open the throttle the motor gets a increase in air. If the fuelling profile is not matched to the air flow the explosion will be either to lean (bog) or rich (lartharjic) if its right then you just accelerate.

- Needle and emulsion tubes

- Cutaway
Once again to the casual observer it looks standard

- 24mm TY hybrid
Ps
I forgot to mention I have also worked on the piston. Basically the hole in the back of the piston matches the inlet port whith and lower, possibly higher I dont remember what I did but it would have looked right for that barrel. There is a balancing act between that and the bottom of the piston skirt dropping off. you also have to be carefull how you leave the filed surfice otherwise you could encorage a crack. The time between a crack and failour is instant as I have never seena bent one. I set mine at should be good for the life of the piston. Also did other mods for better. Lubricating the skirt and rings.
By enlarging the hole in the back of the piston you can maintain the flow energy you create. When the piston goes up it creates a vacuumed in the crank area as that void is being filled you create a certain momentum. All I am trying to do is not hinder the airs desire to fill a void. This again equates to more fuel/air for a bigger bang.
Mods summary:
Exhaust burnt out.
You can do this with oxi but I chuck them in a big burn off pile until they glow red and then some. Clean them up after and repaint. This guarantees you have a clear exhaust for flow.
Porting the barrel.
Exhaust
The exhaust port has ridges on the sides as the studs run past that area. Flatten it out as thin as you dare to go. 1mm would be enough. The top of the exhaust port needs cleaning up as there is a ridge there. Remove it and square it up a bit. You can polish the port if you like.
Transfers
Clean them up top and bottom remove dags and match the metal to the alloy. Check for small chamfers on top of port and none on sides. At the base of the transfers sharpen the divider and around smoothen. Not polished. Never leave scratches going in the direction of flow. If you have to leave scratches always make them diagonal.
Inlet
Clean up the same way but don’t remove any material. In my opinion the area is too wide for the read block and could do with packing. When you clean up go for a burnished look and not polished. Polished drags on the flow.
Piston
The back of the piston has a big influence on how much you can pack into the crank area. Match the back of the piston hole to the port area. The less piston you have the better but you have to leave some as it stops the piston from rocking which limits you win what you can do. Chamfer all the bottom edges of the piston. The front and back should be done already just match the sides. This forces oil between the piston and boar and not cut/scrape it off. If you have a DT piston where the top ring is not at the very top edge, match the exhaust port profile to the piston and shape (hard to explain but it makes a big difference)
Reeds
Do as I did. The small boyesen reeds are good for opening early and staying open a fraction longer as they don't have the desire to snap closed like the thick base ones do. Good for low revs. The single long read is thin but beeping one price it is a bit tougher
Reed block
You will have to use Boyson ones or some other one piece. Thinning the centre bar out as much as I did would mean the standard reeds would fall in. Only thin from the sides and not the depth as you need every bit of strength you can get when it’s that thin. Leave about 1mm at the ends to seal everything else can be removed and shaped.
Mounting block
Replace with the type I have used. I really don’t understand why they use that one to the side. There is no reason for it that I can see and really blocks/messes up flow.
24mm DT 175 carb
Clean it up and check every passage, jet, replace o rings, jet the best you can like I did.
Inlet track
Just copy
If you want me to do it for you it would cost you $500 plus postage, parts and up to 3 months. Wouldn’t do it on a old crank or piston.