Hi Everyone,
David Lahey wrote: 
Well that's amazing Greg.

It is so counter-intuitive that I'm not really convinced yet that you are not just playing another trick.
Yes David, I can get things backwards.......
So now for an update as I got to have a good ride on the

TL 250 on Sunday.
This is an old post of George's referring to differences between TL 250 and XL 250 Motosport:
TriCub wrote:About the only thing that is the same is the basic motor, everthing else is totaly different.
Even the motor is a bit different. From memory the TL head has a centre inlet port(same as the later XL250), TL cam is a softer grind , the ingnition flywheel is the same as an XL350, the TL has different gear ratios , TL has the later style crankcases with ball bearing mains although the cranks are the same as are pistons, cylinders, valves and all the cam drive bits.
They are quite popular with the Pre75 MX guy's being the only pre75 Jap four stroke that is anything like usable in MX.
When I read this, my thoughts were that the flywheel was heavier because it was off the XL 350 but I now realise that was wr wro wr well you get the point. Still do not know how much an XL 350 flywheel weighs but my guess is 2 kilos.
Back to the riding and I think the heavier flywheel is the single best modification that I have done to the TL 250 as it makes it smoother. Even going up and down through the gears is more enjoyable plus the power is more linear. With multiple restarts stopping to clear some vines and lantana, there was no stealing of the kickstart so I am happy about that. One negative that has come to light is the Variable Idle Speed is more noticeable like the TLR 250 with Keihin carby. They are basically the same carby on both models so not surprising really. A Mikuni would fix that I am sure!
So my

TL 250 theory has now changed, I used to think that when

made the TL 250, they panicked about the weight so they made the tank out of aloooominium....... The stated 99 Kilograms was a bit optimistic but I understand why they were worried about tripple digits!!!! Now that I have weighed the seat (goes on after the tank):

- IMG_20240115_114437.jpg (1006 KiB) Viewed 5835 times
My new theory is they chose a 600 gram lighter flywheel and hoped for the best!
This is not about a Twinshock but it is relevant here, Donna's bike
Shirley 
125 was a little racey for her so I tried to source a flywheel weight and no such animal anywhere! There was an old truck axle that held my door open, it had a nice sizeable flange for mounting the wheel on. So we machined a ring out of it and heat-shrunk it on. The outside diameter was what was left after machining the stud holes off and the width was worked out to clear the pick up and cover but I did not weigh it.

- IMG_20240115_115637.jpg (1.26 MiB) Viewed 5835 times
It has been on there for years now and certainly made it more rideable.

- IMG_20240115_115821.jpg (896.71 KiB) Viewed 5835 times

- IMG_20240115_115855.jpg (714.26 KiB) Viewed 5835 times