I have been thinking about the difference in emulsion tubes and main air jets between the TY and DT carbs.
My previous theories are wrong not that I know I'm right now.
The TY uses a 2.5mm main air jet and the two hole emulsion tube. This explains why the TY comp has 240 main jet and the TY175JC only a 140. The JC like the DT use a 5 hole emulsion tube with a very small main air jet. This arrangement seems to suit upper rev ranges.

- 2.5mm main air jet TY comp
- image.jpg (67.36 KiB) Viewed 14344 times
This is a YZ 80 and it has a 1mm main air jet where the DT has a 0.4

- 1mm main air jet YZ 80
Left is the TY comp emulsion tube and right top is the JC and bottom early DT with the 5 holes.
Theory is low revving motors like to have well atomised fuel at low revs. That's why they have the big air jets and and large main jets. The main jets are so large because there is a lot of air mixed in with the fuel so you have to have big jets.
The JC, DT, YZ all have small main air jets which restricts the amount of air that can be mixed in with the fuel on the way up which is why they have smaller main jets to suite.

- Emulsion tube for atomising fuel
Looking at the 2 types I mistakenly thought the 5 x 0.5mm holes would flow more than the 2 x 1mm hole but the maths says other ways !? By a long way nearly twice the amount.

- Tricked me
I have three problems with what my motor is wanting:
1- the main jet is 360. Which is really large and only have jets for 140 through to 300
2- the needle is on clip five which is the richest. I tend to think if I'm on that edge of the range it's out of balance
3- I'm using my smallest pilot jet 2.25. Which is quite small normal is a 2.5 to 3.5. The air screw is at 3 1/2 turns out which means I need to go smaller?
I tried a #2 slide cutaway but its muddy the 1.5 is better. As the main jet is so large I tried with out a jet to see if that works but is didn't by a long way (good) standard is 2.5
I'm thinking the big air intake system and my porting on the bell mouth may be causing the need for a large main jet. So is an attempt to bring the jet sizes back into the range I have I decided to restrict the main air jet back from 2.5mm to 2mm. This in theory will lessen the air mixed in with the fuel in the emulsion tube and therefor draw more fuel and need a smaller jet. As the DT and YZ do. This carb had a small main air jet like the DT but it drilled it out to 2.5 like the TY as there is a noticeable difference in feel between the two.
The problem is how to restrict the main air jet. I used a float bowl overflow nozzle, chamfered the tip, small wrapping of electrical tape to pad it out to the right resistance and sealed it in shrink wrap. What ever I make I have to be able to reverse it re-jet to another size if need be. I have now started my own main air jetting process

- 2mm hole
I'm thinking this may be another reason for some kind of catastrophic failure if that falls out and is sucked in but should hold

- 2.5mm reduced to 2mm
I expected that I would be to rich but all it did was go better by filling the top end out. I guess i fixed my tad lean issue. I can't begin to change the needle settings till I find the celling on richness. It will do for the next ride.
I'm on the edge of a theory that puts the large hole emulsion tube at a evolutionary dead end.
The large main air jet, emulsion tube and main jet were for a small 22mm carb boar size and large low revving piston.
All the other bike variations had bigger carbs and revs. With the big holes, small carb boar, low rev, long draw you have to atomise the fuel this way as ferocity of revs is not going to do it.
By having a 26mm carb which is 28% larger than the standard 22mm but still using the small boar atomisation process I am to some degree I am drawing? (Need to think this one out more)