Hi Everyone,
Kombivan wrote:I had a XL250 and I could never imagine one in trials high speed gearing heavy, gutless. don't get me too wrong as I rode mine most in quarries and the beach rear ends were heavy I did find the xl250 good in sand dunes at high speed. Maybe the guy that started the story stopped in a gold top paddock and for the rest of the day he thought he was on the best trials bike in the world.
Kombivan, Maybe that is how the Goldwing came to be?
David Lahey wrote:Some UK XL250s like Greg's were modified for trials competition back in the day
David, if that first photo was taken before they released the TL 250, then the header pipe was retained.

- IMGP7997.JPG (135.69 KiB) Viewed 4603 times
The second photo reminds me of my Ferguson TEA 20, the petrol tank wraps around the cylinder head, when you work it hard on a hot day you can hear the petrol boiling in the tank! Makes you wonder why they tilted the motor back elevating the head into the bottom of the tank? Wouldn't work very well in Gladstone.
TriCub wrote:About the only thing that is the same is the basic motor, everthing else is totaly different.
Even the motor is a bit different. From memory the TL head has a centre inlet port(same as the later XL250), TL cam is a softer grind , the ingnition flywheel is the same as an XL350, the TL has different gear ratios , TL has the later style crankcases with ball bearing mains although the cranks are the same as are pistons, cylinders, valves and all the cam drive bits.
George, it was the different inlet port that caught me out when I bought the bike, as I wanted the head for a TL 250 with worn out cam journals. Realising the error, the obvious thing to do was to fix the bike and ride it. All has worked out OK as I have swapped the XL complete for a TY.